The Other Party launched in Britain today, promising to decentralize power and return it to the public via blockchain technology.
Powered by blockchain technology, The Other Party aims to disrupt traditional centralized political structures, paving the way for a more direct and transparent democratic process, according to a statement.
“Our mission is to take centralized power away from politicians and put it back in the hands of the people,” said Dom Ryder, founder of the Other Party. “By using blockchain technology, we ensure that every voice is heard, every vote counts and every decision is transparent and incorruptible.”
It is unclear what traction, if any, The Other Party will have in the British political landscape, but it is notable that blockchain technology is becoming an increasingly important part of the political conversation.
Management passports
The Other Party’s initiatives include ‘governance passports’, which are issued as NFTs to British voters. The passports act as a digital identity on the blockchain to ensure votes are “immutable, traceable and protected from manipulation or undue influence,” the report said.
The idea is that eligibility can be verified while maintaining voters’ anonymity when participating in political decision-making, giving every passport holder the power to propose, vote on and directly implement policies.
The Other Party deviates from conventional left-right politics and positions itself as a neutral facilitator of the people’s will. All elected representatives of the party would be legally obliged to follow the decisions of their constituents rather than toe the party line.
“This isn’t just about politics; it is about enabling every individual to actively shape our society. The Other Party is a movement for those who believe in a future where democracy is truly by the people, for the people,” Ryder added.
POD token (Proof Of Donation).
The other party has also introduced a POD (Proof Of Donation) memorabilia token, which should act as a “digital sticker,” according to its website. The tokens are issued on the Ethereum blockchain and are available through the decentralized exchange Uniswap.
POD has a fixed supply of around 3.5 trillion, which is said to reflect the total amount of British Pounds in circulation. According to the Other Party, the token has no use or value whatsoever. However, “just like stickers, flyers, letters or other political memorabilia, we do not want to deter our donors from transacting in their proof of donation if there is a secondary market and they become collectible or desirable as memorabilia,” it says the website.
The other party’s website also provides a link to view the party registration on the website of the UK election regulator The Electoral Commission. However, the registration details are not yet visible on the site at the time of publication. Pending applications were last updated on December 7. The Other Party did not respond to a request for comment from The Block regarding the current status of its registration.
The British crypto hub stands in contrast to the US
The other party is not the only one keen to use blockchain technology in the country. In June, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak expressed a desire to provide clarity on how crypto companies should register and operate in Britain, announcing plans to turn the country into a Web3 hub.
Last month, UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt also outlined legislation to expand the country’s digital assets sector through his Digital Securities Sandbox initiative – which aims to facilitate the adoption of digital assets in financial markets – expected to be launched in will begin in the first quarter of 2024.
The UK position is somewhat in contrast to the US crypto environment, with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stating in June that the US regulatory environment was “harming America’s economic competitiveness,” in response to the Security and Exchange’s lawsuit Commission against the crypto exchange for alleged securities law violations. .
This week, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon told Senator Elizabeth Warren that the government should shut down crypto, noting that it can circumvent government controls.
