In just a few years, decentralized networks have witnessed tremendous growth, with government bonds collectively surpassing limits $25 billion and membership is growing. As several US states and nations like Switzerland, Maltaand Hong Kong introduce favorable crypto legislation, it’s hard not to see Web3 as the future shape of business organizations.
However, the blockchain space currently has hundreds of competing protocols, and developers often have to choose between launching on a single chain, limiting their reach, or integrating multiple chains, which can be complex and introduce new vulnerabilities, not to mention silence from the suffocating liquidity. This fragmentation hinders collective progress and limits the broader adoption of blockchain technologies. It’s time for this to change.
We need to give developers the opportunity to focus on building as simply as possible. Fortunately, there are direct integrations that can not only bridge the gaps in Web3 in a direct, simple and straightforward way, but also extend the capabilities of each chain beyond their original designs, enabling new and more efficient innovation.
The complexity of decentralization across multiple chains
The fact is that the benefits of a multi-chain strategy are convincing. Such an approach provides resilience, allowing services to take advantage of the benefits of multiple chains while helping to offset their weaknesses. This adaptability enables flexible, continuous operations even when a blockchain faces challenges. Furthermore, by spanning multiple ecosystems, it is possible to foster improved collaboration, bridging the gap between varied blockchain communities. For financial platforms, multi-chain operations allow for seamless access to liquidity from various decentralized exchanges, regardless of their underlying blockchain.
Many current offerings, such as bridges, Layer 2 and sidechain networks, work ‘alongside’ existing blockchains and serve as a medium for connecting different networks. While these solutions are promising, having so many competing protocols – often with their own tokens – results in isolated ecosystems and significant fragmentation of available liquidity.
Even if multiple chains have a working bridge to connect them, the existing transaction times and compounding costs of moving across such infrastructures can make the practice unattractive and limit the capabilities of this ecosystem.
Furthermore, developers can still easily become overwhelmed by the sheer volume of existing blockchain protocols, especially for those switching from Web2. It is simply unrealistic to expect development teams to have a working knowledge of all these chains or how to implement the services that connect them. Not to mention that the use of individual blockchains and bridges is opening up new security issues, as these often act as separate, centralized points of failure; it is even conceivable that there could be bridges considered illegal under changing regulations, which further increases the risk of government seizure.
This makes the current landscape untenable. Developers don’t have to understand the dozens of different access points to Web3 or pay the associated fees to get involved. What’s needed instead is a decentralized “network of networks,” one that is not only built 100% on-chain, but also already knows how to transfer value and information across multiple protocols without developers having to start from scratch start or have to rely on third parties. bridges. This is where direct integration between chains can make the biggest difference.
Moving beyond Layer-2s to direct integration
Direct integration can be made possible via so-called ‘chain key’ cryptography. This allows a single network to sign transactions executed on other chains.
Contracts built on this technology are then enabled to reliably store and process assets in other chains and even tap directly into their smart contracts. There is no longer a need for central bottlenecks between ecosystems; this process enables functional, reliable replacements for the existing problematic bridges.
Being able to implement a multi-chain future from a single access point is about more than just scalability and interoperability. Such an evolution could have important meaning for both developers and users. First, projects can benefit from faster time to market, because using cryptography to communicate with other networks means these teams don’t have to ‘reinvent the wheel’. Another benefit this brings is more freedom for creative teams to experiment, as they already have access to many of the systems they need, freeing up bandwidth for exploring new ideas.
As for users, the new access to cross-chain liquidity should significantly improve their ability to move their money across platforms and put them to work in the most lucrative places. Users also don’t have to learn all the different platforms, making it trivial to access tokens on multiple chains from a single interface, which will also greatly improve the broader user experience. Making Web3 accessible and intuitive will be an important cornerstone in rolling out broader public adoption.
As the world continues to embrace the business value of a more decentralized future, the focus must increasingly be on embracing technologies and tools that enable inclusivity and collaboration. Multichain access, enabled not by Layer 2 networks and bridges but by chain key cryptography, will play a key role in this journey, opening a new door for developers to access these tools, enabling flexible and innovative building and makes way for a collaborative and interconnected tomorrow.
