The concept of retaking introduces a groundbreaking way for people to use their staked cryptocurrency simultaneously across different protocols. This not only increases the reward potential, but also significantly improves the security and scalability of blockchain networks, benefiting the entire crypto ecosystem.
Introduction to retaking
A common phenomenon in the rapidly evolving world of blockchain technology is the development of new mechanisms and protocols that improve the efficiency and security of existing and future crypto projects. When projects using these new mechanisms or protocols succeed, the entire crypto ecosystem benefits, not just individual projects.
One of those innovative mechanisms is repossession, the use of blockchain assets to secure other applications. This article provides an overview of retaking, relating it to staking and proof-of-stake (PoS), how retaking works, the types of retaking and the associated benefits, disadvantages and risks.
Staking and Proof-of-Stake
To understand retaking, it is essential to first understand the concept of staking within the context of proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain networks. PoS is a method used to keep blockchain networks secure and ensure transactions are correct. They do this by reaching consensus, which means that the various network participants agree on the information on the blockchain. This ensures that everyone in the network has the same data and agrees on which transactions are legitimate.
In PoS systems, validators (also known as stakers) lock a certain amount of cryptocurrency to secure the network and participate in block creation and validation. This locked or staked cryptocurrency acts as collateral and ensures that validators act in the best interest of the network. Misbehavior by a validator can lead to some of the staked assets being seized, also known as ‘slashing’.
Staking plays a crucial role in maintaining the security and integrity of PoS networks. The greater the amount of cryptocurrency deployed, the more secure the network becomes. Validators earn rewards for their participation, usually in the form of interest on their staked assets.
Traditional staking has limitations, mainly that staked assets are locked within a single protocol and cannot be used elsewhere.
What is resume?
Restaking allows validators to simultaneously redeploy their staked cryptocurrency across multiple PoS-based services. This means that the same assets can secure multiple platforms, increasing their usefulness and potential rewards. The concept of resumption addresses two limitations of traditional staking:
- Limited reward generation: Validators can generate multiple revenue streams by rearranging their deployed assets in more than one protocol.
- Shared network security: Large, mature blockchains can extend their robust security to networks and services that are just getting started. This can also improve the overall security of blockchain networks.
With Restaking, participants can secure additional services such as oracle networks, data availability layers, and blockchain bridges.
Species resume
Readmission can be divided into two types: original readmission and fluid readmission. Most people will probably use liquid re-inclusion because native re-inclusion requires expertise when running your own validator.
- Indigenous readmission: Advanced users with expertise in running their own validator can use native rerecording. Validators participating in native retaking must use additional node software specific to the retaking network or service, allowing them to securely provision their deployed assets within the retaking ecosystem.
- Fluid reabsorption: This type of redraw uses Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) such as Lido (STETH). Users simply deposit their LSTs into liquid withdrawal platforms such as Puffer, Ether.Fi and Renzo, which handle the complexities of setting up and managing the service. These cash withdrawal platforms offer users Liquid Redemption Tokens (LRTs) that can earn interest and be traded for additional returns.
How resuming works
In both native and liquid recaptures, the core idea is to maximize the use of deployed assets by securing multiple protocols simultaneously. Native redraw requires the use of a validator node and running additional software, while liquid redraw uses liquid staking tokens to provide users with a more flexible and accessible way to participate in redraw.
Indigenous readmission
Native retaking on platforms like EigenLayer is mainly aimed at users who use their own validator. Here’s how native re-recording works:
- Validator node requirement: To participate in native retaking, users must use a validator node for the specific PoS blockchain. This means that the native cryptocurrency is used to secure the network.
- Smart contracts and asset management: Native reinstatement uses a series of smart contracts or protocols that manage the assets deployed under a validator’s node. These contracts ensure that the deployed assets are safe and well managed.
- Additional node software: Validators wishing to perform native re-recording must download and run additional node software required by the re-recording network or service. This software can be integrated with the existing validator configuration.
- Acceptance of the withdrawal conditions: Validators must agree to the terms of the readmission program, which includes additional slash terms.
- Securing protocols: By participating in native retaking, validators can redeploy their deployed assets to secure multiple networks or services simultaneously. These can include data availability layers, new virtual machines, and oracle networks.
- Earn extra rewards: Validators earn additional rewards based on the number of additional protocols they help secure. Rewards are commensurate with level of participation and validated protocols.
Fluid reabsorption
Liquid withdrawals utilize liquid staking tokens (LSTs), which represent staked assets and can be further used in withdrawal protocols. This is how resuming fluids works:
- Staking with a Validator: Users initially stake their assets (e.g. the PoS blockchain’s native cryptocurrency) with a validator via liquid staking protocols. In return, they receive liquid staking tokens (LSTs) that represent their stake with the validator.
- Receive LSTs: The LSTs act as a representation of the deployed assets, allowing users to maintain liquidity while their assets are deployed. These tokens can be transferred, traded, or used in other protocols.
- Plotting LSTs on readmission protocols: Users can then deploy their LSTs on a fluid intake protocol. This process involves depositing the LSTs into the smart contracts of the liquid resttaking protocol.
- Actively explore validated services (AVSs).: Once the LSTs are deployed on the redraw protocol, users can explore available networks and services, called AVSs in Eigenlayer, to redeploy their tokens. These networks and services can acquire security infrastructure through the readmission process.
- Earn extra rewards: Similar to native readmissions, users who participate in liquid readmissions can earn additional rewards by securing multiple protocols. The rewards are distributed based on the number of protocols and the level of participation.
- Opt-in service with additional Slashing terms: As with native retakes, users must accept additional slash terms set by each network and service. These terms are intended to encourage appropriate behavior and protect the security of the network or service.
Benefits of resuming
Restaking offers several benefits for validators and the broader blockchain ecosystem:
- Increased flexibility: Validators can use staked assets in various financial activities without the need to unstake, providing access to liquidity while maintaining the potential for rewards.
- Improved reward potential: By redeploying deployed assets across multiple protocols, validators can generate multiple revenue streams.
- Scalable security: Restaking allows protocols to flexibly scale their security based on network requirements, providing a cost-effective approach to scaling network security.
- Enhanced security for new protocols: New and evolving protocols have access to a large number of validators from the start, significantly strengthening their security.
Disadvantages and risks of returning to work
While returning to work offers many benefits, it also comes with several risks and challenges:
- Centralization risk: Validators offering higher APYs through readmission services may attract more delegations, potentially leading to centralization of interests and loss of neutrality.
- Compound cutting risk: Retake introduces additional slash conditions. Validators risk significant losses if they violate these conditions, as each protocol imposes different shaving terms.
- Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts used in re-execution protocols may contain bugs or vulnerabilities that could lead to financial loss or exploitation.
- Counterparty risk: Validators must trust third-party operators to manage their deployed assets. If these operators fail to meet network conditions, validators may face heavy fines.
Examples of readmission protocols
EigenLayer is a prominent example of a recapture protocol on Ethereum. Other readmission protocols in early development include:
- Picasso on Solana
- Octopus 2.0 on Close
The next steps for restarting
Retake addresses key limitations of the traditional strike model. This innovation increases the potential rewards for validators and also improves network security by collecting resources and sharing them across platforms.
As resuming continues to evolve, it will likely play a critical role in the future of blockchain security and decentralized finance, despite its inherent risks and challenges. Validators, developers and investors should conduct thorough due diligence before participating in resuming protocols to effectively deal with these risks.
Are you going to try resuming? Share your thoughts and opinions on this topic in the comments below.