Senate -Republicans have accelerated the efforts to bring the first extensive federal stablecoin legislation, the genius Stablecoin bill, for a bottom of the floor before the Memorial Day break.
Senate majority leader John Thune has formally moved to accelerate the consideration of the guidance and establishment of national innovation for the American Stablecoins (Genius) act this week, so that a potential room -wide decision was set up on 20 May on 20 May.
The legislative maneuver increases the use in Washington’s long -term debate about Stablecoins and positions the bill as a critical marker in the digital activist policy of the United States.
The Genius Act, which in March adopted the Banking Committee of the Senate by an 18-6 dual margin, would establish a framework for payment stablecoins. It would require 1: 1 support with cash or treasury and require monthly certificates.
It would also place large issues under the supervision of the Federal Reserve and at the same time keep paths for smaller players at state level.
Supporters of the bill
The supporters of the account, led by Senators Bill HagertyCynthia Lummis and Tim Scott, claim it is that Necessary to maintain dollar primacy and bring crypto activities under clearer regulatory standards.
“I am looking forward to taking on the Genius Act in the short term to maintain innovation in America in America, to protect customers and ensure that foreign companies play according to the same rules,” Hagerty said.
The bill is positioned to respond to the rapid growth of stablecoins as an engine for urgent legislation. The total stablecoin capitalization is now greater than $ 241 billion, with the market leaders being the vast majority of the vast majority.
Backers claim that the provision of legal clarity will ensure that these dollar-linked tokens continue to anchor the global crypto markets and at the same time support the demand of the American debts through a mandatory reserve interests.
Opposition is quickly mounted from both progressive democrats and influential bank groups.
Opposition against the bill
Senator Elizabeth Warren, who emerged as the highest profitable critic of the bill, warned that the framework ‘large tech companies and other conglomerates of green light could be’ to issue their own stablecoins.
A coalition of more than 20 community bank organizations repeated these concerns in a letter last month, with the argument that risks the proposal that traditional deposits are moved and the financial system can be exposed to new vulnerabilities.
The path ahead remains uncertain. Despite the control of the Senate, Republicans need at least seven democratic voices to reach the threshold of 60 votes needed to promote the bill.
While the measure released the committee with two -part support, Democrats remain divided. Legislers such as Kirsten Gillibrand and Mark Warner, who have indicated openness for Stablecoin legislation in the past, will probably play decisive roles.
Genius Stablecoin Act Next Steps
Even if the brilliant action knew the Senate, differences with the home version can push the last negotiations deep into the summer. The Huis Financial Services Committee has advanced a parallel bill with stricter disclosure requirements and reconciliation between the rooms may be difficult.
Federal Reserve officials have provided measured support for the supervision of Stablecoin, in which Governor Christopher Waller previously stated that both banks and non-banks must be able to spend regulated tokens.
While leaders of the Senate are preparing for a critical mood later this month, the debate reflects wider tensions about the future of digital money.
Republicans position the bill as a means to guarantee the American monetary influence and the call from President Donald Trump to “keep the innovation of digital dollar onthore”. In the meantime, opponents continue to warn of potential risks of privatized forms of digital money.
The Senate decision on the genius Stablecoin Bill in the coming weeks will mark a crucial moment in the regulation of Stablecoin, the ability of the legislators to bridge part -time and industry to test in the pursuit of a national framework.