HSBC is recent launch of retail gold tokens highlights the growing adoption of tokenization of financial assets, a practice that is transitioning from early adoption to mainstream use.
However, challenges remain in ensuring standardization and broader integration.
Tokenization of assets uses blockchain technology to represent ownership of real-world assets (real estate, art, stocks, etc.) as tradable digital tokens. These tokens act as digital certificates of ownership, enabling fractional ownership. As a result, it broadens the investor base and increases trading activity, increasing liquidity in these markets.
A critical limitation of many current tokenization platforms is their limited scope, according to Ralf Kubli, board member of the Casper Association.
He explained that tokenization platforms prioritize the digitization of the underlying asset itself, neglecting to reflect the associated liabilities and cash flows. As a result, an asset-backed token is created and linked to a blockchain, with a separate PDF document containing the terms and conditions.
Overcoming the transparency gap of tokenization with smart financial contracts
However, the reliance on manual cash flow calculations negates the efficiency and automation that tokenization promises. This lack of transparency and accountability around cash flows poses a substantial risk, reflecting a critical vulnerability exposed during the 2008 financial crisis.
“Current projects do not define the cash flows of the underlying financial instrument in a machine-readable and machine-executable term sheet,” Hubli told Cryptonews on Thursday.
“If we don’t do this, we will still face the same risks that have plagued the financial sector for years. Especially the brute force efforts needed around reconciliation.”
The role of smart contracts in tokenization
Kubli proposes a clear solution: ensure that all cash flows are defined algorithmically and deterministically within these assets.
This makes the development of ‘smart financial contracts’ necessary. These contracts not only encode information about the tokenized asset, but also explicitly define all payment obligations of the parties involved. In doing so, they would comprehensively define both the asset and liability aspects of the financial instrument.
“Fortunately we have such a standard available. It was founded in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis Algorithmic Contract Types Unified Standards (ACTUS) Research Foundation was established to help clarify the cash flow patterns of collateralized financial instruments,” he said.
“Now they have created and implemented an open source standard that any company could use.”
The adoption of standardized cash flow definitions within tokenized assets, as advocated by Kubli, would provide financial institutions with real-time visibility into their resources and liabilities. This greater transparency could significantly reduce the risk of a future crisis mirroring the events of 2008.
