The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has strongly opposed Coinbase’s motion to compel additional discovery in their ongoing legal battle.
The dispute centers on Coinbase’s sweeping demands for documents that the SEC says are irrelevant and overly burdensome.
In a memorandum filed on August 5, the SEC argued that the exchange’s discovery requests require vast amounts of information, much of which is irrelevant to the core issues of the case or is privileged.
SEC arguments
The SEC outlined several key points against Coinbase’s motion. First, the SEC claims that the documents requested by the exchange are not relevant to the primary issues of the case, arguing that the court’s analysis of the facts and law, and not the SEC’s internal discussions , will decide the case.
Second, the SEC highlighted the significant burden associated with reviewing and producing millions of documents. The company noted that it has already spent more than 400 hours reviewing documents and preparing a 648-page privilege log. Expanding the search to millions of additional documents would be excessively burdensome.
The SEC also challenged Coinbase’s defense, stating that the application of the law to digital assets is clear and that internal SEC communications are not relevant to this objective legal standard.
Additionally, Coinbase’s request for a sample of SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s emails is particularly controversial. The SEC argued that this request is disingenuous and burdensome, especially since Gensler has stated under oath that he does not use personal devices for SEC business.
The role of the Court
The SEC’s memorandum emphasized the Court’s role in determining the relevance and proportionality of discovery requests. The regulator stated that proper discovery should focus on what the suspect did, emphasizing that the scope of discovery should be tailored to the specific facts and legal questions at issue.
As the legal battle between the SEC and Coinbase continues, the court’s decision on this discovery dispute will play a crucial role in shaping the proceedings. The watchdog claims it has more than met its discovery obligations and calls for Coinbase’s motion to be dismissed, labeling it an unwarranted and burdensome demand.
As both sides prepare for further legal confrontations, the broader cryptocurrency industry and legal observers are closely watching developments, which could set important precedents for the future of digital asset regulation in the US.
