The persistent disconnect between policymakers and technology invariably results in proposed and adopted regulations that overlook relevant parts of new technologies. US lawmakers and regulators face the challenge of regulating emerging blockchain and AI technologies. Policymakers, such as Senator Cynthia Lummis, have recognized the need for innovation in the financial sector and proposed legislation such as the Digital Asset Innovation Act to allay concerns. however, the SEC’s Recent Actions Against Ripple Labs emphasize the current “regulation-by-enforcement” approach, which critics say hinders innovation.
To be effective, they must be well-versed in cryptocurrency and the underlying technology. For example, public blockchain assets allow any person or entity to mine coins and tokens; there is a significant threat to the end consumer and national security if mining activities are not monitored and controlled. That said, the aim has been to regulate blockchain under current regimes which, while doing their utmost, cannot create a framework to effectively address the real risks that could threaten our financial markets.
Senators Elizabeth Warren and Roger Marshall are sponsors and supporters of the Anti-Money Laundering Digital Assets Act of 2022, which would provide specific rules for crypto. The downside is that the rules are similar to rules we currently have been forced to fit into blockchain technology. A 51% attack poses a significant threat to national security, especially as more and more users enter the crypto market.
Although the bill calls for certain entities to register as money services companies, blockchain is not considered a global activity. The influence of US regulations has been significantly reduced beyond our borders. A possible solution would be to create a blockchain monitoring division of FinCEN.
Policymakers often respond to public concerns. Because they are usually responsive, solutions are sometimes superficial at best, creating rules without a nuanced understanding of the technology. This oversight results in attempts to fit crypto into existing regulatory frameworks, without considering the complexity inherent in new technology.
A proactive regulatory approach is likely to be most effective for regulating blockchain technologies. Lawmakers and regulators should probably start with a task force made up of industry leaders, consumers, miners and enthusiastic regulators to determine the regulations, rules and laws that will be most effective.
Major crypto players have looked to regulators for regulatory clarity to ensure consumer protection. Instead of providing comprehensive new frameworks, policymakers are pursuing enforcement actions against the industry, as evidenced by SEC lawsuits and high-profile settlements against major crypto companies. This “regulation-by-enforcement” approach is fundamentally flawed; it creates adversaries, not allies, and suppresses innovation that the government could use to improve itself.
Uncertainties about the legal status of digital assets, as illustrated by ongoing cases such as from Hinman, hinder progress. Rather than relying on traditional lobbying efforts, policymakers should actively engage with the crypto community and industry professionals. The lack of defined precedents from unresolved court decisions in crypto cases is detrimental to both parties.
While the judiciary may not make laws from the bench, well-formed opinions discussing the court’s views on blockchain can benefit the way lawmakers act. The lack of clarity on whether digital assets or investment products are securities is hindering progress toward comprehensive cryptocurrency regulation.
Adding to the challenge, many politicians continue to confuse the good and bad uses of blockchain technology. Some even continue to associate crypto with illegal activities and other risky activities. These views promote public doubt and hinder individual participation in the crypto industry.
Dispelling these misconceptions is crucial to advancing an accurate understanding of the crypto landscape. The aforementioned task force could be the solution. Crypto transactions are significantly more complicated to hide than cash transactions.
Contrary to popular belief, crypto transactions are not a secret haven for criminals. Crypto offers enhanced traceability, with a searchable, immutable record of every transaction. Understanding the significant differences between crypto and traditional banking transactions is critical to informed policymaking. Can be seen by a wider audience,
Law enforcement can be critical in leveraging blockchain intelligence to monitor activity on public blockchains and identify bad actors. A well-trained task force familiar with blockchain technology is a powerful deterrent to criminal activity.
Policymakers face the ongoing challenge of adapting to the rapid pace of technological progress. A proactive approach is essential to formulate effective regulations, requiring connectivity with projects and key players, rather than relying solely on traditional lobbying efforts.
The crypto community and industry professionals can contribute to a more informed policymaking process by forming trade groups and inviting policymakers to educational events. Bridging the knowledge gap is essential for creating regulations that enable innovation while ensuring safety.
Suggested actions for policymakers to build a secure and innovative crypto future
Striking a balance between improving security measures in the crypto space and promoting innovation requires an informed approach. Policies must be designed to protect users while allowing the industry to thrive, especially if the U.S. aims to maintain global leadership in innovation.
Realizing crypto’s full potential depends on the extent to which policymakers understand its complexity. It’s time to move beyond superficial approaches and embrace a more informed regulatory environment that supports innovation and safety. The crypto community is willing to engage in constructive dialogue and bridge the gap between technological advancements and effective regulation.