The SEC approved Ethereum ETFs via delegated authority, a decision that could have a significant impact on the crypto market. Unlike January’s approval of the Bitcoin ETF, which required an SEC vote, this approval did not undergo a public voting process by commissioners. This approval method, as noted by James Seyffart, means that any commissioner, such as Crenshaw, can request a review, although this would not change the decision.
The lack of a public vote has raised questions about the political forces within the SEC. Seyffart emphasizes that while delegated authority is the norm for many decisions, the lack of transparency in this case leaves room for speculation about the commissioners’ positions. According to Seyffart, the lack of a detailed voting record clouds the political lines drawn during the approval process.
MetaLeX’s Gabriel Shapiro commented on the procedural nuances, noting that only 19b-4s were approved, not S-1s. He argued that this technical distinction explains why Ethereum did not experience a significant price increase following the news and suggested that it could still be denied.
This community confusion led Bloomberg ETF expert Eric Balchunas to confirm that the approval process was standard and would not be “challenged in any meaningful way.” Balchunas reiterated that while the approval is final, the procedural method used was typical of the SEC. He suggested the market’s muted reaction was due to expected approval, especially after major news earlier this week.
The approval of Ethereum ETFs means a potentially positive outlook for future crypto ETF applications. However, the SEC’s delegated authority process has sparked debate about the need for greater SEC transparency and the potential political influences behind such decisions.
The post No Vote Needed for SEC Approval of Ethereum ETF in Positive Sign for Other Cryptocurrencies appeared first on CryptoSlate.
