Speed is not just a challenge for blockchain – it is the decisive factor between adoption and aging. If Web3 cannot match the seamless experience that users expect, it does not matter how decentralized or innovative it is.
The current state of development speaks volumes: according to the builders of A16Z’s Builder Energy, which follows where Crypttos builders make their efforts, infrastructure development is good for about one fifth of the activity, with Layer 1 and Layer 2 projects that form more than a third of that segment. Since most of these projects are aimed at supplying high transactions speeds without corresponding high costs, it is clear that scalability and processing times remain an important limitation of the industry.
Blockchain scalability, however, should not become the only lens, so we evaluate transaction speeds. Achieving the highest transactions per second is not in itself a goal – it is a means for a better user experience. In the areas where Web3 gets the most traction – namely trade and gaming – fast settlement is not a luxury; It is a requirement to compete with Web2 -affected operators.
Acting to Defi
The demand for trading on chains has increased. According to the annual State of Crypto report from A16Z, the decentralized exchanges (DEXS) are now dealing with 10% of the total spotcypo -trade -a dramatic shift from only four years ago when centralized exchanges (CEXS) dominated 100% of the market.
In the meantime, the total value has been locked (TVL) in Defi for the first time since 2021, over $ 100 billion, and analyst projects project Constant Expansion, where Defi is expected to grow with a CAGR from 45% to 2032.
But Web3 does not compete in a vacuum – Legacy Finance does not stand still. If trading platforms for chains want users to remove TradeFi, they must offer speed, seamless UX and reliability on the same footing with platforms such as Robinhood or Fidelity. The reality is that Blockchain will never match the centralized servers of Tradfi in raw speed – physics, latency and decentralization make that impossible. But that is not where Web3 wins. The edge is not measured in milliseconds; It is measured in confidentiality, finality and programmable financing – Things Legacy Systems simply cannot offer.
The real struggle is not just about the execution speed; The point is how much trust, efficiency and flexibility Web3 can inject into the financial stack. Trading on the chain is not about aging TradeFi-it is about building a financial system where finality is directly, markets are open and speed is trust, not intermediaries.
Game studios build it for themselves
Although Gaming Flitsen of Mainstream has seen interest, the early increase in Axie Infinity to NBA Top Shot’s Collectibles Boom, the long -term adoption, remains elusive. This year Ton emerged as a hub for blockchain-based gaming, with viral hits such as Hamster Kombat, Notion and Catizen. These trends suggest that blockchain can add new layers of ownership and economic stimuli to gaming – but viral success is not equal to sustainability.
The real chance lies in immediate assets scheme, real players’ ownership and permissionless economies, but can only work if blockchain tech can work with speeds that cannot be distinguished from traditional game servers. If transaction entertainments or high costs create friction, web3 gaming risks a novelty instead of a revolution -a niche experiment instead of a fundamental shift in the industry.
Unlike Defi and on-chain trade, which have seen institutional support, Blockchain-Gaming is still in its experimental phase. Developers face a different series of challenges: Although traders can tolerate some transaction costs, gamers will not do that. As reimbursements and latency interruption gameplay, blockchain titles simply cannot compete with the seamless experience of traditional games. That is why some studios, frustrated by existing infrastructure, have built their own chains – such as Sky Mavis with Ronin or Dapper Labs with Flow.
This gives an unfulfilled need for: Web3-gaming requires tailor-made infrastructure for fast, cheap transactions. Instead of forcing developers to solve these problems themselves, the industry must supply block chains that are as invisible as powerful. After all, Game Makers must be aimed at building compelling experiences, not to fully reinstall new networks.
The need for high speed blockchains
If blockchain ever has to use demanding cases such as trade on chains and gaming, the industry needs really scalable, fast networks that are able to match the seamless experience of Web2. Solana’s Rapid Rise illustrates the demand for fast, cheap block space, but the struggle with Uptime emphasizes the challenge to deliver scalable speed without compromises. Even the Layer 2 solutions from Ethereum, while the speed and cost efficiency are improved, introduce their own series of challenges – head including interoperability and fragmentation.
The travel direction is good, but the clock ticks. Blockchain infrastructure must evolve quickly enough to realize the promises of Web3 before Web2 -affiliated operators absorb his best ideas. Speed is crucial, but speed alone is not enough. The real goal is not only to match the performance of Web2 – it is to build a confidential, open and composite basis that Web2 cannot replicate.
Author bio
Tristan Dickinson is the Chief Marketing Officer at Exsat Network, a docking layer for Bitcoin. Tristan, a dynamic and visionary marketing manager, brings a wealth of experience of the banking, financial services, web3 and technological sectors.
