House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry has accused SEC Chairman Gary Gensler of misleading Congress about Ethereum’s classification during his April 2023 testimony.
The accusation comes amid escalating tensions over the regulatory approach to digital assets in recent months, with some industry participants filing lawsuits against the watchdog for overstepping its authority.
‘Arbitrary and capricious’
In a rack Released on April 30, McHenry highlighted that recent court documents suggest Gensler deliberately dodged questions from the committee about whether the SEC considers ETH a security.
The allegations raise concerns about transparency and consistency at the SEC, especially since they contradict previous statements from the agency and Gensler.
McHenry said:
“Chairman Gensler refused to answer direct questions about Ether’s status, and now we see that it was part of a deliberate strategy to misrepresent the SEC’s position. The controversy stems from Gensler’s handling of questions during an April committee session where he was asked for clarity on the SEC’s position on digital currencies, specifically Ether.
The Financial Services Committee believes this episode is indicative of a broader pattern of “arbitrary and capricious” regulatory enforcement by the SEC under Gensler.
According to McHenry, the watchdog’s enforcement approach stifles innovation and leaves American consumers unprotected. It also poses risks to national security.
The classification of digital assets such as Ethereum has significant implications for the crypto industry, affecting everything from investor protection to the regulatory responsibilities of various government agencies.
Historically, the SEC has not classified Ethereum as a security, which aligns with the broader industry’s expectations for less stringent regulation. However, recent documents have shown that the regulator internally considers ETH as a security as early as 2018.
Clear framework
The committee advocates passage of the bipartisan “FIT for the 21st Century Act,” which aims to establish a clear regulatory framework for digital asset markets and provide robust consumer protections.
The SEC has not yet responded to the allegations in McHenry’s statement. However, these developments are likely to fuel ongoing debates over the regulation of digital assets and the role of government supervision in promoting innovation while ensuring market stability and consumer protection.
The controversy follows a recent federal court decision that sanctioned SEC enforcement attorneys for misleading the court, casting additional shadows on the agency’s credibility and operational integrity under current leadership.
Chairman McHenry and other committee Republicans have pledged to continue their oversight efforts to hold the SEC and Gensler accountable for what they describe as regulatory overreach.
