Coinshares Head of research James Butterfill called the notorious “Bitcoin Death Cross” -Indicator “Total Nonsense”, with reference to historical data suggesting that these events Often precede a positive return Instead of long -term falls.
Butterfill made the statement in a post of 8 April, a day after Bitcoin (BTC) had registered a death pattern of Death. On April 7, BTC’s 50-day simple advancing average (SMA) fell to $ 86,485.72 and fell under the 200-day SMA at $ 86,839.64.
Assessment of 11 past death crosses, Buttefill discovered that BTC usually registers small losses within a month after the event. However, median and average values for the next three and six months are positive.
A death cross is a generally referred technical signal that the potential downward momentum indicates when the simple moving average of 50 days falls under the 200-day SMA.
Historical data show profit instead of collapsing
The return of Bitcoin after the past events vary considerably. The dataset contains 11 historical authorities that go back to 2011 and measures BTC price changes in one month, three months, six months and 12 months after each earlier instance of the event.
A month after a death cross, the median return of Bitcoin -1.6%was, while the average was -3.2%. With the three -month figures, those figures improved to a median of 3.7% and an average of 13.6%.
Six months and 12 months of return Schupper, with an average return of 17.0%and 52.3%respectively, although the median return of one year remained negative at -17.2%.
The divergence in performance emphasizes the inconsistency of the indicator as a predictive tool. For example, the death cross of March 2020 preceded a price increase of 450%a year later.
Similarly, the events of 2011 and 2015 ultimately led to the return of triple figures the following year, in contradiction with the Bearish interpretation of the signal. Conversely, the death cross from 2021 and 2018 went on double digits after twelve months in advance.
Butterfill pointed to these mixed results to claim that the pattern is missing empirical reliability. He said:
“For those of you who think the Bitcoin Death Cross means everything – it is total nonsense, and in fact often a good buying.”
