Amazon has updated its purchase conditions for Kindle-E books in the United States to clarify that customers are gaining a license for the content, not owned. The new statement is: “By placing your order, you buy a license for the content and you agree to the terms of use of the Kindle Store.“This update is specific to American customers; International users continue to see the previous formulation, but the message is the same: you don’t have it; We only let you use it.
From February 26, 2025, Amazon will stop the “Download and transfer via USB“Feature for Kindle devices. This means that users can no longer download Kindle books directly to their computers for manual transfer, because access to purchased content is now completely dependent on the cloud infrastructure of Amazon. This change points to a subtle truth about ownership and strengthens a simple fact: it is not yours if someone else can take it away.
This is not only an Amazon problem, but applies to all content and materials in our current digital age. Your favorite songs and albums on your streaming app are not accessible without an internet connection. They limit the number of devices you can listen to, and they add advertisements unless you pay them a monthly fee. Beyond are the days of records, tires and CDs that have the freedom to listen as you want, resell or even give away to a friend.
What does it mean to possess something? Ownership is usually understood if the action or state of owning something. In this case we clearly own the content, but it can be changed or taken away from us at any time. That is not true ownership. Oxford states that ownership is defined as “the exclusive right to use, possess and throw away ownership”. So exclusivity is required.
What about other immaterial digital items such as money or identity? You own your name or handle on social media or e -mail. That is you, it is your online parable, persona and content that you have made. You cannot have two people with the same name or handle, and that exclusivity is enforced by a password in the account, but that account can be locked, banished or deleted at any time by the decisions of Facebook or X. What about that money in your bank account? You own it, and you have legal rights, but banks freeze bills and governments always grab money. That is not true ownership.
So I ask again: what does it mean to own something? It is not enough to possess it; Having exclusivity or even legal rights is not sufficient. To really own something, you should only be able to enforce that possession and exclusivity. In the physical world, enforcement largely comes down to coercion and the threat or actual use of violence. The evacuation message from the Sheriff department, the armed guards for a safe, rearranging boundaries after a war. In the digital domain, coding serves this goal and at the same time removes the need for violence by not making strength effective. It creates ownership that cannot be lifted by violence. No amount of physical strength can break strong cryptography. A government can seize a server and a company can take out an account, but if data is encrypted and the key is private, the information remains inaccessible. The only way to gain access to encrypted assets is due to permission.
Encryption not only protects digital ownership; It changes the nature of power. It removes violence from the comparison. That’s why it’s so disturbing.
Digital signing in coded systems is how you prove ownership and control in the digital world. With PGP you can sign messages and files, which proves that they have come from you and have not changed. Nostr, a decentralized social media protocol, works in the same way. Your messages and identity are bound by your private key, no company that can prohibit or delete you. Bitcoin is an example of this principle. Driving your private keys means that only you can open and manage your money. When you sign a Bitcoin transaction, you can only access your money and move. No bank can freeze it, no government can take it without your key. Real property is about the authority to enforce that property.
The Bitcoin -Aaxioma “Not your keys, not your coins” stands up in me. “Not your keys, not your coins” means that if you have no control over the private keys of your bitcoin, you will not own it. If you keep Bitcoin on an exchange, the stock market holds the keys, not you. They can freeze your account, limit recordings or even lose your money. Broker accounts and pension accounts with Bitcoin ETFs can be frozen or confiscated as any bank account. Real property means that you hold your keys, because only then will you have full control over your money, identity and property.
The shift from physical to digital has made access easier, but ownership cloudy. Whether booking, being music, identity or money is only possessing is an illusion of ownership. Companies can withdraw access, governments can seize money and platforms can delete identities, but coding changes. Ownership becomes enforceable, not by laws, a company or an institution, but by mathematics. If you really want digital property, the rule is simple: check your keys or someone else is the real owner.
This is a guest post by Will Jager. The expression of opinions are completely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
This message not your keys, not your content: property in a digital era first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and was written by Will Jager.
