The following is a guest post from Tim Delhaes, CEO and co-founder of Grindy.
The vote in Crypto has shifted.
For some, the completely blown nihilism-web3 has become a rigged casino, a game of an insider in which those with the right connections print wealth at the expense of all others. The scales scandal exposed what many suspected, but few could prove: a coordinated Playbook where hype, exclusivity and controlled liquidity create an air mirroring, only for insiders to redeem at the height, so that retail investors with dust have been left behind. The recent Bybit -Hack only strengthened the feeling of disillusion -errors on security, insider games and extractive behavior seem to define the space more than innovation ever.
For others this is the wake-up call that we needed. The illusion is crushed, but the mission remains. Now that the mechanics of these schedules are exposed, we have a choice: continue with the same road, rewarding speculation in the short term, or look carefully at the systems we build and ask better.
The danger is not only regulations – it is the return of centralized gatekeepers
Although many are aimed at the potential legal shifts guided by the prospect of looser enforcement and clearer industrial-specific regulations in the US and the dream of another Bull Run, the real threat is already here.
Take Telegram. For a long time considered as one of the most essential platforms in Web3, it has quietly turned to adapt to American supervisors and large technical players, which maintains monopolistic restrictions on blockchain development. This is a well -known playbook: Apple’s App Store 2.0, but for crypto. Control access, dictate which chains get visibility and the ecosystem on their conditions are reformed.
We have seen this before. Web2 was deemed to be open to a handful of companies consolidated electricity, walled gardens built and the internet changed a rental-resistant empire. And yet, instead of pushing back, a lot of web3 remains derived by the following volatile hype cycle: Memecoins, Vaporware projects and casino tops with hamster theme.
The origin of Bitcoin was not about ease – it was about resistance. Web3 may not replicate traditional financing; It should be Replace it with something better. But decentralization is difficult, and without a clear dedication to the principles, we see the industry sliding back into the hands of centralized players.
Regulation will not save us, and that was never assumed
Some claim that regulatory action could curb this trend, just as the EU forces Apple to open his payment systems. But counting supervisors to protect web3 is the message of a fool. Governments act in their own interests, and when the dominant story of Crypto is Speculation about substanceIt is not difficult to see why policymakers consider it as an industry that is worthwhile to comprehend instead of promoting.
The real question is not whether regulators will intervene. It is whether web3 can still prove Gambling a goal.
The way for us: stop rewarding empty hype
The solutions are not abstract, they are actually structural. We know how this ends when we have not checked the monopolistic check. We know that platforms with centralized gatekeepers will always give priority to profit above principles. We know that “security” and “user protection” are often just PR-friendly euphemisms for control.
And yet, instead of financing and building real alternatives, both the spotlights and liquidity on the same schedules that make Web3 look like a Ponzi playground instead of a real technological movement.
This is not just about ideology; It’s about survival. Censorship resistance, interoperability and decentralized control are not only moral views – they are the only real competitive benefits of Web3. The moment we mimic the monopolistic models of Web2, we lose everything that made Crypto worth fighting.
The path ahead is clear: open systems, cross-chain accessibility and ruthless resistance to centralized control. If Web3 continues to give priority to speculation over infrastructure, hype over substance and fast flips about long -term innovation, we will not blame anyone for its downfall but ourselves.
