In a surprising turn of events, the US SEC has brought forward its decision-making process regarding Franklin Templeton’s Bitcoin ETF filing, which was not due until January 1, 2024.
The watchdog pushed back the previous deadline of November 15 to January 1, 2024, to allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the proposal’s alignment with regulatory standards, particularly in the areas of investor protection and market integrity.
Essentially, the SEC appears to have effectively extended the deadline a month before the original decision date. The move could indicate the regulator is giving Franklin additional time to review his application before further deadlines. Notably, Franklin Templeton is the only applicant that has not updated its S-1 form and addressed prevailing concerns about potential market manipulation. The asset manager entered the spot Bitcoin ETF race in September and plans to list the fund on CBOE.
This early move has caught the attention of market observers as Franklin Templeton, an asset manager overseeing $1.5 trillion, has not yet filed an updated S-1 form.
S-1 form
Franklin Templeton’s lack of an updated S-1 form has fueled speculation about its potential impact on the SEC’s final decision. Franklin is the only issuer in this application round that has not submitted revised documentation.
James Seyffart, an industry analyst, suggested that this move could be a strategic move by the SEC to pave the way for a series of approvals in early January. The hypothesis is consistent with the possible approval of Hashdex’s application, which is also in the queue.
While the crypto market eagerly awaits the SEC’s decisions, the regulatory body continues to prioritize thorough review to ensure investor protection and market stability.
Concerns about market manipulation
Central to the SEC’s proceedings are concerns about potential market manipulation and the ETF’s ability to protect against fraudulent activity.
The committee has emphasized the need for robust mechanisms to prevent manipulative practices in the Bitcoin market. The proposal’s consistency with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which imposes rules on stock exchanges to prevent fraudulent acts and protect investors, is being closely monitored.
The other ETF filers – including BlackRock and Fidelity Investments – have already filed updated S-1 forms with responses to many of these concerns.
Virtually all applicants argue that the existence of a futures market and ISG membership of the listing exchanges allow adequate monitoring of a Bitcoin market of sufficient size.
The main argument from exchanges and asset managers is that the SEC, which has approved futures-based Bitcoin ETFs traded on the CME, should not reject a spot Bitcoin ETF since both futures and spot-based products rely on the same underlying markets for pricing. .
